The mystery of morphometric measurements of the coxal bone
  
Yazarlar (6)
Hatice Güler
Erciyes Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Arş. Gör. Emre UĞUZ Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Halil Yılmaz
Ordu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Hande Nur Taşdemir
Erciyes Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Eylem Yalman
Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Gökçe Bağcı Uzun
Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (Ulusal alan endekslerinde (TR Dizin, ULAKBİM) yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Medicine Science
Dergi ISSN 2147-0634
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler EBSCO, Google Scholar, Akademik Dizin, Biblio Med. EuroPub, Sobiad, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), Index Copernicus, Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI), TÜBİTAK/ULAKBİM Tıp Veri Tabanı, Türkiye Atıf Dizini, Türk Medline
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 01-2023
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 12 / 3 / 724–729 DOI 10.5455/medscience.2023.05.059
Makale Linki http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2023.05.059
Özet
Coxal bone, which is included in the structure of the pelvic skeleton, is in close relationship with the pelvic organs and great vessels. The aim of this study is to show the harmony between morphometric measurements using the correlation technique, based on the idea that the proportional harmony in different parts of our body will also be in the coxal bone. In the study, 95 dry coxal bone belonging to the Turkish population were examined. In dry bones of adults, the distance between anterior superior iliac spine and posterior superior iliac spine (A), distance between anterior inferior iliac spine and posterior inferior iliac spine (B), distance between anterior superior iliac spine and anterior inferior iliac spine (C), distance between posterior superior iliac spine and posterior inferior iliac spine (D), symphysial surface length (E), symphysial surface width (F), ischial tuberosity width (G), ischion-pubis arm thickness (H), coxal bone length (I), distance between the symphysial surface and the most protruding part of the ischial tuberosity (J) were measured with caliper. There was no statistical difference in the comparison of different measurements made on the right and left coxal bone in our study. In correlation studies, between (B) and (A) (r: 0.566), between (I) and (A) (r: 0.595), between (J) and (A) (r: 0.600), between (E) and (J) (r: 0.563) measurements showed a positive correlation relationship. In this study, excellent agreement was found in different morphometric measurements in coxal bone.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Coxal bone | correlation | harmony | clinical | morphometry
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
The mystery of morphometric measurements of the coxal bone

Paylaş