An investigation of the relationship between clinical features of amoebiasis and Entamoeba histolytica genotypes
Yazarlar (7)
Remzi Engin Araz Faculty Of Medicine, Türkiye
Özgür Koru Faculty Of Medicine, Türkiye
Mehmet Tanyüksel Faculty Of Medicine, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Tuncer Özekinci Dicle Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ali Ceylan Dicle Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Hatice Zeynep Gücllü Kilbaş Faculty Of Medicine, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Muttalip ÇİÇEK Dicle Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Diğer (Teknik, not, yorum, vaka takdimi, editöre mektup, özet, kitap krıtiği,
araştırma notu, bilirkişi raporu ve benzeri)
(SCOPUS dergilerinde yayınlanan teknik not,
editöre mektup, tartışma, vaka takdimi ve özet türünden makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1300-0144 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 12-2012 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 42 / 0 / 1147–1156 | DOI | 10.3906/sag-1112-23 |
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Tıbbi Parazitoloji (Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji)
|
||
| Özet |
| Aim: To determine the presence of Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar and E. moshkovskii in stool samples, tRNA-based short tandem repeat gene polymorphism in E. histolytica isolates, and the relationship between amoeba load and clinical outcome in studies. Materials and methods: This study involved 840 stools samples of individuals having diarrhea/dysentery and individuals who were asymptomatic by using microscopy, culture, E. histolytica antigen ELISA, and conventional/real-time PCR methods. Results: Of the 840 samples analyzed, 4.3% (36/840), 2.6% (22/840), and 7.4% (62/840) of the stool samples were determined to be positive by E. histolytica antigen ELISA, and real-time PCR for E. histolytica and E. dispar, respectively. Thirty-five of the 62 (56.4%) samples positive for E. dispar and 20 of the 22 (91.0%) samples positive for E. histolytica were from dysenteric individuals as revealed by real-time PCR. Although there was no statistically significant difference in patients with diarrhea, a correlation might be seen between amoeba load and clinical outcome in those infected with E. histolytica, since amoeba load was usually determined 103 copies/mL or higher in patients with diarrhea. In this study, 3 different genotypes were defined in 16 isolates by using 6 loci (A-L, N-K2, D-A, R-R, S-D, and STGA-Q). Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that real-time PCR is a useful, reliable, and sensitive method for the determination of E. histolytica in stools and for differentiation from E. dispar. It is suggested that parasite load might affect clinical outcome. © TÜBİTAK. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Amoebiasis | Entamoeba histolytica | Genotyping | Real-time PCR | TRNA gene |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Scopus | 1 |