Can Successful Outcomes be Achieved using the Single-Row Rather Than the Double-Row Technique for Repair of a Rotator Cuff Tear?
Yazarlar (1)
Prof. Dr. Hakkı Çağdaş BASAT Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(Uluslararası alan indekslerindeki dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Sakarya Tıp Dergisi | ||
| Makale Dili | – | Basım Tarihi | 01-2019 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 9 / 1 / 68–73 | DOI | – |
| Makale Linki | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/smj/issue/43872/485092 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji
|
||
| Özet |
| AimTo compare the outcomes of patients grouped according to the intraoperative size of the anteroposterior tear treated using double- or single-row repair techniques.Material and methodsWe examined the outcomes of 112 patients who met our inclusion/exclusion criteria by using the preoperative and postoperative Constant scores. We divided the patients treated using single- or double-row techniques into 4 groups based on the intraoperative size of the anteroposterior tear, including both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears. Further, we divided the patients in these 4 groups into two additional subgroups treated using single- and double-row techniques.ResultsThe single-row group included 64 patients and the double-row group included 48 patients. The mean follow-up time for the single- and double-row groups was 35.6 and 33.5 months, respectively. We observed a significant improvement in the outcomes of patients in the single- and double-row groups; the preoperative and postoperative Constant scores of patients in the single-row groups were 36 and 81.2, respectively (p = 0.00001). The preoperative and postoperative Constant scores of patients in the double-row groups were 31.6 and 74.3, respectively (p = 0.00001). Patients with an intraoperative tear size of 1-3 cm treated using the single-row technique showed better outcomes than those treated using the double-row technique (postoperative Constant scores 81.2 and 71.86, respectively, p = 0.00585).ConclusionThus, the single-row repair technique was used successfully in patients with supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears ranging from 1-3 cm. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
