Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites
Yazarlar (3)
Öğr. Gör. Burak SİVRİKAYA Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. İlhami Demir Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Özer Sevim Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(Ulusal alan endekslerinde (TR Dizin, ULAKBİM) yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2149-8024 | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | TR DİZİN | ||
| Makale Dili | Türkçe | Basım Tarihi | 06-2020 |
| Kabul Tarihi | – | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 17-06-2020 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 6 / 2 / 68–72 | DOI | 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003 |
| Makale Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Yapı ve Malzemeleri
Yapım Teknolojileri
|
||
| Özet |
| Concrete has a significant place in construction structures, is a material that can beeasily damaged due to incorrect design, incorrect material selection. Concrete maybe damaged by physical and chemical factors. One of these factors is the alkali-silicareaction (ASR). ASTM C1260, is a short-term test method, and ASTM C227, is a longterm test method, are used to measure effect of alkali-silica reaction. In this study,the effect of fly ash additive use with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt.% replacement of cementwas investigated in short- and long-term ASR test methods. For this purpose, whilesamples prepared for ASTM C1260 were kept in NaOH solution 14-days, samples prepared for ASTM C227 were waited 360-days in normal water solution. As a result;mortar bars with 20% fly ash additive ratio were classified as harmless for ASR inboth test methods. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları |