Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites
Yazarlar (3)
Öğr. Gör. Burak SİVRİKAYA
Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
İlhami Demir
Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Özer Sevim
Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(Ulusal alan endekslerinde (TR Dizin, ULAKBİM) yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2149-8024 | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | TR DİZİN | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 06-2020 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 6 / 2 / 68–72 | DOI | 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003 |
| Makale Linki | https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003 | ||
| Özet |
| Concrete has a significant place in construction structures, is a material that can beeasily damaged due to incorrect design, incorrect material selection. Concrete maybe damaged by physical and chemical factors. One of these factors is the alkali-silicareaction (ASR). ASTM C1260, is a short-term test method, and ASTM C227, is a longterm test method, are used to measure effect of alkali-silica reaction. In this study,the effect of fly ash additive use with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt.% replacement of cementwas investigated in short- and long-term ASR test methods. For this purpose, whilesamples prepared for ASTM C1260 were kept in NaOH solution 14-days, samples prepared for ASTM C227 were waited 360-days in normal water solution. As a result;mortar bars with 20% fly ash additive ratio were classified as harmless for ASR inboth test methods. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları |