Effects of using insoles of different thicknesses in older adults: Which thickness has the best effect on postural stability and risk of falling?
Yazarlar (4)
Prof. Dr. Öznur BÜYÜKTURAN Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Serdar Demirci Balikesir Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Buket BÜYÜKTURAN Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Yavuz Yakut Hasan Kalyoncu University, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association (Q4) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 8750-7315 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 12-2020 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 12-04-2026 | Yayınlanma Tarihi | – |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 110 / 6 / 1–7 | DOI | 10.7547/17-085 |
| Makale Linki | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11782/2199 | ||
| Özet |
| BackgroundPostural stability (PS) problems arise as individuals grow older, and as a result, risk of falling (RoF) increases in older adults. We sought to examine the effects of insoles of various thicknesses on PS and RoF in older adults.MethodsFifty-six study participants had PS and RoF evaluated statically and dynamically under five different conditions: barefoot, only-shoes, with 5-mm insoles, with 10-mm insoles, and with 15-mm insoles. Standard shoes with identical features were used. To avoid time-dependent problems, these assessments were performed under the same conditions in 3 consecutive weeks. The average of these three values was recorded.ResultsInsoles of different thicknesses significantly affected static PS (overall: P=. 003; mediolateral [ML]: P=. 021; anteroposterior [AP]: P=. 006), static RoF (overall, ML, and AP: P<. 001), dynamic RoF (overall: P=. 003; ML: P=. 042; AP: P=. 050), and dynamic … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 20 |
| Scopus | 6 |