Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-T)
Yazarlar (5)
Prof. Dr. Öznur BÜYÜKTURAN
Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Buket BÜYÜKTURAN
Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Aysu YETİŞ
Ahi Evran Training And Research Hospital, Türkiye
Gülhane Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Türkiye
Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Özgün Makale
(SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences (Q4) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1300-0144 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 08-2018 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 48 / 4 / 805–810 | DOI | 10.3906/sag-1801-120 |
| Makale Linki | https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/issues/sag-18-48-4/sag-48-4-15-1801-120.pdf | ||
| Özet |
| Background/aim: This study aimed to assess validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors withLimited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-T).Materials and methods: The individuals who met inclusion criteria of the study were in patients of a hospital and a long-term carefacility. Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE), Cornell Dementia Depression Scale (CDDS), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), visualanalogue scale (VAS), and PACSLAC-T were administered to all subjects. The scales were repeated with an interval of two weeks fortest–retest reliability.Results: A total of 112 patients with dementia were included in the study. The intraclass correlation coefficient ICC for test–retestreliability of the PACSLAC-T was 0.713 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.486–0.843. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for total PACSLAC-Twas 0.842 for test and 0.888 for retest, which indicated substantial internal consistency. In convergent validity, there were significantcorrelations between PACSLAC-T total score VAS (r = 0.684, P < 0.001), while no correlation was found between PACSLAC-T totalscore and CDDS (r = 0.127, P = 0.094), and GDS (r = 0.096, P = 0.167). Also, significant correlations were found between PACSLAC-Ttotal score and MMSE (r = –0.468, P = 0.016).Conclusion: This study showed that PACSLAC-T could be a promising tool for the management of pain in older adults with limitedcommunication skills. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Aged | Assessment | Pain | Pain assessment checklist for seniors with limited ability to communicate (PACSLAC) |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| SCOPUS | 5 |
| Google Scholar | 10 |