Assessment of the Crypto Market Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Unit Root Tests with Different Approximations (Blockchain Economics and Financial Market Innovation)
Yazarlar (3)
Doç. Dr. Yüksel İLTAŞ Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Gülbahar ÜÇLER Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Ümit BULUT Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Kitap Adı | Blockchain Economics and Financial Market Innovation | ||
| Bölüm(ler) | Assessment of the Crypto Market Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Unit Root Tests with Different Approximations | ||
| Bölüm Sayfaları | 191-200 | ||
| Kitap Türü | Kitap Bölümü | ||
| Kitap Alt Türü | Alanında uluslararası yayınlanan kitap bölümü | ||
| Kitap Niteliği | Scopus indeksinde taranan bilimsel kitap | ||
| Kitap Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 01-2019 |
| DOI Numarası | 10.1007/978-3-030-25275-5_10 | ISBN | 978-3-030-25274-8 |
| Basıldığı Ülke | Basıldığı Şehir | ||
| Kitap Linki | https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030252748 | ||
| Özet |
| In the last decade, scholars assessed the ramifications of the global financial crisis on economic growth, stability, and prosperity. Major studies analyzing the roots of the financial crisis demonstrated the fact that financial stress in advanced economies had been transferring to emerging economies via an integrated financial system. In these studies, it was also highlighted that the transmission of financial stress caused a meltdown in global economic activity. To which extent the massive collapse of financial institutions, regulated monetary, and fiscal policies were linked to this global economic meltdown? Was it possible to prevent this collapse while integrating a more secured digital system without any intervention of the governmental institutions? Could blockchain economics be part of the more stabilized global financial system? Answering these questions is not so easy without knowing more about the components … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 53 |
| Google Scholar | 2 |
| Scopus | 1 |