Comparison of Turkish and English YouTube videos on phlebotomy in terms of content, reliability and quality
Yazarlar (3)
Sevda Korkut Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Ayla ÜNSAL Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Ali Kaplan Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Nurse Education in Practice (Q1) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1471-5953 Dergi Bilgileri (2023) | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 07-2023 |
| Kabul Tarihi | – | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 01-07-2023 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 70 / 0 / – | DOI | 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103669 |
| Makale Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103669 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Hemşirelik Esasları
|
||
| Özet |
| AimThis study was conducted to evaluate the content, reliability and quality of YouTube videos about phlebotomy.MethodA retrospective, register-based study was conducted exclusively with videos publicly available on YouTube in June 2022. Ninety videos have been evaluated in terms of content, reliability and quality. This evaluation was performed by two independent researchers. The skill checklist created with reference to the WHO blood collection guide was used for the content evaluation of the videos. The short form of the DISCERN questionnaire was used to evaluate the reliability of the video. The quality of the videos was evaluated with a 5-point Global Quality Scale.ResultsThe mean validity score of the English videos was 2.58 ± 0.88, the quality score was 2.98 ± 1.02 and the content score was 8.78 ± 1.47. In the Turkish videos, the mean validity score was 1.90 ± 1.27, the quality score was 2.35 ± 0.97 … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 4 |