Comparison of Some Bacterial Identification Methods
Yazarlar (5)
Özgül Gülaydın
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Türkiye
İsmail Hakkı Ekin
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Cihat ÖZTÜRK
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ziya İlhan
Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Erdal Öğün
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (Uluslararası alan indekslerindeki dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Turkish Journal of Veterinary Research | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2602-3695 | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | Index Copernicus | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 06-2019 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 3 / 1 / 9–12 | DOI | – |
| Makale Linki | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjvr/issue/44815/506998 | ||
| Özet |
| Objective In this study, three different methods were compared for the identification of some Gram positive and Gram negative reference bacteria. Materials and Methods For this purpose the identification accuracy rates of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, Serratia marcescens were analysed by conventional bacteriological methods, commercial bacterial identification test kit (Microgen™ ID) and automated bacteria identification system (BD Phoenix 100™). Results As a result of analyses, the identification accuracy rates of examined cultures were 94.5%, 95.2%, 94.6%, 89.6%, 91.1%, 92.5%, 86.9%, 96.4% by conventional bacteriological methods, 93.84%, 89.2%, 98.86%, 96.55%, 97.98%, 95.43%, 86.69%, 92.39% by commercial bacterial identification test kit and 98%, 99%, 99%, 96%, 96%, 97%, 99%, 98% by automated bacteria identification system, respectively. Conclusion In comparison of methods, the identification accuracy values obtained from the automated system were higher than the other methods. It was concluded that automated identification systems that developed for accurate, reliable and rapid identification of bacteria, could be used as an alternative to conventional methods and commercial kits. In addition, it was thought that it would be useful to evaluate the identification of biotypes obtained from clinical isolates by similar methods. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
