The Assessment of Subjective Well-Being Map of Turkey
Yazarlar (2)
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Öznur AKGİŞ İLHAN
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Bildiri Türü | Tebliğ/Bildiri | Bildiri Dili | Türkçe |
| Bildiri Alt Türü | Tam Metin Olarak Yayınlanan Tebliğ (Uluslararası Kongre/Sempozyum) | ||
| Bildiri Niteliği | Alanında Hakemli Uluslararası Kongre/Sempozyum | ||
| Kongre Adı | INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GIS APPLICATIONS IN GEOGRAPHY GEOSCIENCES (ISGGG 2017) | ||
| Kongre Tarihi | 18-10-2017 / 21-10-2017 | ||
| Basıldığı Ülke | Türkiye | Basıldığı Şehir | Çanakkale |
| Bildiri Linki | http://isggg2017.comu.edu.tr | ||
| Özet |
| Edward Soja says that people are as spatial as social, the space is socially produced and therefore changed by socially. Accordingly, whatever your area of research is, if you do not acquire a spatial perspective, your work will not be qualified enough.From this point of view the aim of this study is to determine the level of subjective wellbeing of the provinces in Turkey and to determine spatial distribution of subjective wellbeing throughout the country. The data set of the study constitutes the results of the 2013 Life Satisfaction Survey conducted by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). 25 variables were evaluated in this study, including income, education-health, access to public services and social networks, which are assumed to be components of subjective well-being. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) analysis is applied. Accordingly, it is determined that 4 principal components explain 76.6% of the total variance. The first principal component alone is the key component with the highest variance explanatory rate, accounting for 51.9% of the variance. For this reason, using the first principal component, the level of subjective well-being was determined by multiplying the value of the variable used and the value of the principal component. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
