Yazarlar (3) |
![]() Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
![]() Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
![]() Bingöl Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
Özet |
Written corrective feedback (WCF) is widely implemented in EFL writing classrooms; however, there is not consensus on how and to what extent it should be used. The controversial findings of the WCF studies reflected in teaching practices and perceptions of the practitioners on WCF, and many studies reported that there was an inconsistency between the teacher practices and perceptions on WCF. Here, the current study aimed to examine the practices of English teachers and their perceptions regarding written corrective feedback and took the form of a multiple-case study to generate insights into the issue. In that, two different cases were described and compared by employing artifacts, think-aloud processes, and semi-structured interviews. The qualitative content analysis of the data demonstrated that the teachers implemented direct and unfocused feedback, and they provided feedback for almost all the occurring errors. Moreover, the teachers considered that direct and unfocused feedback was beneficial, especially for low-proficiency level of students. Overall, the findings of the present study indicated that there was a consistency between teacher WCF practices and their perceptions of WCF. Further findings and suggestions for future studies were provided. |
Anahtar Kelimeler |
Makale Türü | Özgün Makale |
Makale Alt Türü | Diğer hakemli uluslarası dergilerde yayınlanan tam makale |
Dergi Adı | The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal |
Dergi ISSN | 1533-242X |
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | Journals Indexed in Eric |
Makale Dili | İngilizce |
Basım Tarihi | 04-2023 |
Cilt No | 23 |
Sayı | 1 |
Sayfalar | 18 / 31 |
Makale Linki | https://www.readingmatrix.com/files/30-wwqzytgc.pdf |