| Yazarlar |
Arş. Gör. Faik YILAN
Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
Arş. Gör. İbrahim Baki ŞAHİN
Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Fatih KOÇ
Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
Levent URTEKİN
Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
| Özet |
| Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique in which parts are produced with thermoplastic polymer layers in a highly controlled manner. However, the production of ready-made parts using FDM is quite tricky. At the same time, the mechanical properties of parts printed with current print parameters and low-cost 3D printers also vary. The quality and mechanical characteristics of the final part are influenced by production parameters such as the extrusion temperature, infill density, infill pattern, print speed, and layer height. This study focused on the effects of the infill pattern, infill density and print speed parameters on the tensile strength and production time of model structures printed with PLA+ material. A WDM-100E model, a tensile testing machine, has determined the tensile strength of the printed parts. In addition, the parts' tensile strengths and production times have been optimized by the signal-to-noise (SN) ratio analysis. The results reveal that the triangle infill pattern exhibits the best tensile strength at 40 mm/sec printing speed and 100% infill density. On the other hand, the lowest production time is observed in the gyroid infill pattern. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| ANOVA | Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) | Infill Density | PLA+ |
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale |
| Makale Alt Türü | SCOPUS dergilerinde yayımlanan tam makale |
| Dergi Adı | El-Cezeri: Journal of Science and Engineering |
| Dergi ISSN | 2148-3736 |
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | Scopus |
| Makale Dili | İngilizce |
| Basım Tarihi | 01-2023 |
| Cilt No | 10 |
| Sayı | 1 |
| Sayfalar | 160 / 174 |
| Doi Numarası | 10.31202/ecjse.1179492 |
| Makale Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.1179492 |
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| SCOPUS | 7 |
| Google Scholar | 8 |
