| Makale Türü |
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1658-354X Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing's Electronic Databases, EMR Index Medicus, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, MANTIS, National Science Library, OpenJGate, PrimoCentral, ProQuest, PubMed, Pubmed Central | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 04-2014 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 12-04-2026 | Yayınlanma Tarihi | – |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 8 / 2 / 198–201 | DOI | 10.4103/1658-354X.130713 |
| Makale Linki | https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354x.130713 | ||
| Özet |
| Background and Purpose:Today no method of topical anesthesia for intravitreal injection administration has been proven to make the patient comfortable yet. We compared the efficacy of topical levobupivacaine 0.75% and proparacaine 0.5% in patients undergoing intravitreal injections.Materials and Methods:A prospective, randomized study comparing two agents for topical anesthesia in intravitreal injections. Ninety-six consecutive patients were enrolled into two groups to receive either topical levobupivacaine 0.75%(n= 48) or proparacaine 0.5%(n= 48). Patients were asked to score their pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) immediately following the injection. The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. The surgeon performing the procedure scored his perception of the patients’ pain using the Wong-Baker FACES scale.Results:Mean VAS pain scores for two groups were found to be 44.77 … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Anesthetic effectiveness | intravitreal injections | topical levobupivacaine | topical proparacaine |
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Google Scholar | 16 |
| Scopus | 4 |
| Web of Science | 9 |
| Dergi Adı | Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Yayıncı | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| Açık Erişim | Evet |
| ISSN | 1658-354X |
| E-ISSN | 0975-3125 |
| CiteScore | 1,7 |
| SJR | 0,389 |
| SNIP | 0,676 |